Some people say it is OK to use animals for our benefit, others say it is not good to exploit them. Discuss both points of view and give your opinion.

Animals and human have been in good relationship for centuries. Some animals that used to work for human several years ago such as dogs have now become pets; despite that, some animals are still being used today for particular use cases. The rightful use of animals for any benefit other than friends has been widely discussed for a long time; this essay will explore both its advantages and disadvantages.

Nowadays, animals are widely used for various use cases in a good way that benefits both the user and the animals themselves. First important use case is a service dog which serves a person who needs accessibility; without a service dog, it is extremely hard for disabled person to have a normal life. The service dogs themselves have been trained for that matter and they can become best friends of their users. Another use case is using animals in sport; for example, horse races have been held for centuries. It promotes the close friendship and hard work for both a jockey and a horse to win the game, and it is also considered an exercise for both of them. Finally, using animals is an alternative way for low carbon emission; instead of using enormous machinery that consumes fossil fuel and emits CO2, animals can achieve many tasks with much lower CO2 footprint.

On the other hand, excessively using animals or using them in an unmatched use case is very harmful. For instance, some people in some countries pull their animals on hot concrete roads to tourist attractions around the city to take photos with tourists and get some money. Vet community discovered that those animals have severe feet injuries because their feet has been burnt for many consecutive days. They also suffered many injuries around their body because being hit by their owners.

In summary, animals are very good friends of human; using them in the right way benefits both the user and animals themselves. However, some people are forcefully using animals for their own benefit. I believe that it is fine to use animals in the right way; in contrast, government should come up with a regulation that protect animals from being overused or tortured.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, so, still, for example, for instance, in contrast, in summary, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1786.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89315068493 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43145707068 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520547945205 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2124355474 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.625 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8125 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308231544891 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133050209261 0.084324248473 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775571897125 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22388077468 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404791856882 0.056905535591 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.