Shopping in malls have become increasingly popular among customers these days. This results in the shut down of the small local shops. Shopping from large malls provide goods with great quality and a wider variety but such transition affecting local shops causing shut down. I feel shifting from local shops to large malls is a positive development which is explained in this essay.
Buyers moved from small shops to large malls can be termed as a negative development. Most of the local sellers belong to lower-middle strata of the society and this transition affected them drastically. It is reported that many small shop sellers committed suicide being unable to run their family as most of the people choose big shopping centers to buy goods. Such big malls resulted in negative development as it completely erased the local shop communities.
Large shopping malls contributed to the positive development of our society. The quality and variety of products buyers experience in malls can never be found in local shops. According to a survey, shoppers are attracted to shopping malls due to the attractive discounts which cannot be found in local shops. The malls contribute to positive development since it takes care of the main need of their consumers very well.
In recent days, large shopping centers have become the most favorable place for shopping in comparison to local shops. Though, this shift contributes to positive development as the consumer gets products of different variants and premium quality. This cause closing down of local shops which contribute to the negative development of society. To sum up, I feel shopping in malls is always positive for people and should be encouraged.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, well, i feel, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18050541516 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67372819844 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483754512635 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.556004676 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.6875 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3125 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 7.06120827912 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.491406371939 0.244688304435 201% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183996751288 0.084324248473 218% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079268822391 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.328164659104 0.151304729494 217% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553755684408 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.