Many developed countries across the globe help other nations whose economical status is not sound. Often, many people acclaim that this funding is unsuccessful to curb the worrisome issue of poverty, hence, it must be replaced by any other means instead of cash. Nonetheless, this became a debatable topic and in my opine other pragmatic steps along with money flow, both should be provided in order to whittle down the poverty rate.
There are innumerable reasons to support cash as an aid for reducing the poverty. Firstly, by inflow of cash, authorities could provide the most basic neccessities which are food and clothing. Having a balanced diet and cloths to wear would decline the risks of illness. Hence, this will ensure that health care would not be stressed, ultimately saving a huge amount from this section. Secondly, with this currency support weaker economies could ensure law and order is maintained. Becuase this is another crucial element for eradicating the poverty, as with the safety of citizens it will derive them to work with zest and zeal.
However, for eradicating poverty some additional steps are highly needed. Stronger nations do ensure that along with funding neccessary actions are taken to setup industries. These work units will provide employment opportunites, by which people could meet the requirements and raise their living standard. Furthermore, in this way strong ones could also be benefitted by production of the requirments of their own country from the cheaper labour force. Other than this, there needs to be a supervision and proper guidance given to needed economies about their performance, area of improvement etc on timely basis. As it will ensure the proper management which is highly needed for positive results.
Considering and keenly examining the above-cited information it can be implicated that, though money plays an indispensable role but alone it is not sufficient to supress poverty. Other support is needed insync to the financial aid in order to tackle this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...ross the globe help other nations whose economical status is not sound. Often, many people...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 179, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e most basic neccessities which are food and clothing. Having a balanced diet and...
^^
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: CAN_SETUP[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to set up'?
Suggestion: to set up
...th funding neccessary actions are taken to setup industries. These work units will provi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, nonetheless, second, secondly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26073619632 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68804260313 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604294478528 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0222865278 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.882352941 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1764705882 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23529411765 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105111093196 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0341910723566 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475591339507 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0703101345279 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511011166704 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.