rich countries should help poorer countries when they suffer natural disasters.do you agree?

Essay topics:

rich countries should help poorer countries when they suffer natural disasters.do you agree?

It is irrefutable that nowadays, whenever there are developing countries which are affecting natural calamity those time developed countries can help them to overcome from this problem. While, others thinking that who are all affecting catastrophe those countries, we will discuss this matter before any conclusion can be drawn.

on the other hand, many countries who they have more and they can invest money to make effective satellites to identify any natural disaster and which country is going to affect it so they can get the accurate information and intimate to the respective countries. Even though, they can release fund to do precaution those developing countries in order to avoid such a huge natural calamity. Secondly, rich countries are always expecting labours from developing countries only and actually they are backbone of their economy so rich countries can help them. For example, in India recently natural disasters happened on Kerala state and most of the disasters which affected in order to this kingdom of Saudi Arabia released fund to India to overcome form this natural issues because many of the Indians who are all working on that country so they know the value of Indians.

on the one hand, each country their own responsible to save certain amount for natural issue because we can not predict it and it will help to do some proactive work to resolve this problems. Small things will help us from natural disasters such as plant plethora of tress, connect all the rivers, build more lakes and dams it will resolve our problems and we no need to expect fund from other countries. For instance, in China, tsunami generally happens in order to this they built their house without affect from tsunami and nuclear power plant automatically power off while natural disaster will happen so they make themselves to recover it.

To conclude this, whenever we are making ourselves that we can not predict it. If continues disaster happen then we can not do anything so rich countries can release fund to those developing countries because they are backbone of your revenue for your country.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
... before any conclusion can be drawn. on the other hand, many countries who they...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...y so they know the value of Indians. on the one hand, each country their own re...
^^
Line 5, column 178, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...lp to do some proactive work to resolve this problems. Small things will help us fro...
^^^^
Line 5, column 504, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
... to this they built their house without affect from tsunami and nuclear power plant automat...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, if, second, secondly, so, then, while, for example, for instance, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 24.0651302605 199% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05428571429 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49849097314 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497142857143 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.7134372094 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.818181818 106.682146367 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.8181818182 20.7667163134 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.27272727273 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261812995113 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128728155866 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0908779314415 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175064931019 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.076372283427 0.056905535591 134% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.