some believe that modern technology has made people less socially active, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In this fastest world, there are plenty of technologies which are currently available in the market and people are using it including for social activities. But some people are denying and their thought is very minimal activities for society. This is the coin which one head or tail. I am of the opinion who is going to debate this matter before any conclusion can be drawn.
This is coin on the head side, in 50 years before, there are no technology and people who had a good relationship with everyone and the best part is all are known everyone problems and helped to resolved this without any expectation. Also, most of them lived as joined families and their parents and grand parents who motivated people to do social activities. For instance, in 1947, India got freedom in order to people involved in social activities and strikes to get it and finally they have achieved.
This coin is now flip side on tail, however, people are using smartphones and internet to get information very fast and who they can get any information and any problems with in a minute on their phone or system. People who interacted plethora of social activities using Facebook and Whatspp. For example, In Kerala who affected with natural disaster flood in order to this many people who got injured and people posted their problems on Facebook and Whatspp due to that rescue teams who came early and recovered many people and they got the donation from all over the world.
To conclude this, compare to order people and current people who are all using technologies on the right directions for social activities.Also, government responsible to provide awareness how to use gadgets for social activities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... for social activities. But some people are denying and their thought is very minimal activ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 139, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Also
... right directions for social activities.Also, government responsible to provide awar...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, so, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89236111111 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61179207654 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513888888889 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.8682096486 49.4020404114 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.090909091 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1818181818 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119045034363 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0574975487751 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313273546172 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0898603704093 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0170837206147 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.