Rich nations should help poor nations in order to alleviate poverty and related issues. However, some people believe that it is the sole responsibility of poor nations to address this issue. Do you agree or disagree?
There are numerous underdeveloped nations where poverty and other social issues are more prevalent. A section of people believes that developed countries should extend their helping hand towards poor nations to alleviate these concerns; however, others disagree stating that the onus is on the nation itself, and I am in agreement with the later notion.
On the one hand, progressed nations have a huge amount of money. Any individual would support the phenomenon of helping deprived countries by providing basic necessities on the humanitarian ground. Evidently, many knowledge-based economies have provided a better infrastructure for developing education systems and hospitals, and such types of support would definitely help the local government to raise the standard of living of local folks. What is more, educated youngsters boost the economy by creating employment opportunities and reduce poverty.
On the other hand, there are countless arguments against helping poor nations. Firstly, a majority of such countries have political unrest and as a result, financial aid is not distributed to the needy ones due to corruption. For instance, Somalia is a country suffering from malnutrition and exaggravated poverty even though aided several times by a number of International Agencies. Secondly, it would result in an increased dependency of the local government on the wealthy nations. Local councils would never try to combat vivid social issues on their own as they are in the belief that capitalized countries would help them.
Furthermore, taxpayers of the first world believe that it is non-ethical to divert the fund from the public purse to other people who have not contributed to the tax. In other words, it is a discriminatory act to help others and not the ones who are the real beneficiaries of the tax paid.
In conclusion, considering the facts, I believe that poor nations have to find the root causes to combat poverty and other related issues. Consistent efforts would result in the economic progress in the long run.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...helping deprived countries by providing basic necessities on the humanitarian ground. Evidently, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the economic progress in the long run.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in other words, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1733.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3487654321 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96957050025 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570987654321 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5729616712 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.533333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2666666667 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21874819825 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712834601071 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860584735414 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134027451428 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111572695196 0.056905535591 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.