Prevention is better than cure. Researching and treating diseases is too costly so it would be better to invest in preventative measures. To what Extent do you agree?
Health of living creatures on earth is of immense significance. One school of thought believes that it is better to take preventative steps instead of investing in exorbitant researching illness and curing the syndromes. I support medical research undertaken to explore causes of diseases and treating them.
To begin with, there are many compelling reasons for my support for incurring profuse money for discovery in the field of medicines. Firstly, the motto for exploring diseases and its cure is to facilitate mankind with healthy lifestyle. Today, life expectancy of people is nearly 65 years due to availability of vaccines and medicines against malaria, typhoid, diphtheria and many more disease; and longevity may rise to even 85 years in future. Secondly, many viruses and bacteria are getting resistant to conventional antibiotics. What is more, new diseases have developed over the years. Researching for new medicines is the only way and need of the hours to curtail their dominance on human race. Unarguably, it requires more cost but human life is more important than value of money.
Another point to consider is that research and medical treatments supports economy of the country indirectly. First and foremost, this sector gives employment to numerous doctors and industrial chemist involved in mass production of medicines. For instance, Switzerland‘s economy is supported by medical industry. More than 60% income and revenue come from this industry. Furthermore, the entire process also supports development of paramedical sterile equipment manufacturing industries.
To recapitulate, it is true that medical treatments and research are too expensive but at the same time they save lives and flourishes economy. Ergo, I believe that they are vital of the existence and survival of mankind.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 436, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...and longevity may rise to even 85 years in future. Secondly, many viruses and bacteria ar...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le equipment manufacturing industries. To recapitulate, it is true that medical...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, for instance, it is true, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.525 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03304714767 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635714285714 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.7145529355 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4705882353 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.29411764706 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144311098359 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0407503171043 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572689559889 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0894193914954 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0798306308435 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.