For school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is believed that, teachers contribute more in social as well as intellectual development of schoolers father than parents. This essay partially agrees with the statement because intelligence will augment as teachers will bestow knowledge to students and on top of that moral values can also be taught by teachers that help students to develop socially, but, parents also play a significant role because children always imitate them.
The primary reason for agreement is that, valuable acquaintances that teachers are going to give their students. That is to say that, minds of school going children are impressionable that whatever knowledge would be given to them, they will thrive accordingly and eventually the intelligence level will be increased. For example, the complexity of any subject can only be solved, if schoolers have high intellectual levels which is possible only when students grasp appropriately from teachers. Hence, it is justifiable that, teachers have a major role to play in overall mental development of students.
The secondary reason for agreement is that, students can also be studied norms of life by teachers. This is because, teachers can not only teach academic subjects but can also inculcate deep insight pertaining to social development. To illustrate, several times students are admonished by their teachers that will gradually teach them how to behave good amidst society. Therefore, it can be substantiated that, teachers make a great influence socially on schoolers.
However, parents also play an imperative role in intellectual as well as in social development of children due to various reasons. Firstly, parents always act as a role model who are utterly followed by their school going children. Secondly, children spend most of their time with parents, so, they will imbibe the manners, their parents will give to them. Thirdly, dynastic qualities related to intelligence and social development can only come from parents which can have some influence on schoolers. This, it can be said that, parents can also make great implications on their children.
In conclusion, teachers can lift the intelligence of students by giving knowledge and can flourish them socially by teaching social virtues, though, parents can also set their own example for children. So, I partially agree with the statement and it is recommended that, school going children should be patronized by both parents and teachers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-28 | b.yousefi | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-08 | adeagboridwan | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-08 | adeagboridwan | 78 | view |
| 2019-03-13 | kaur_deep | 61 | view |
| 2019-02-07 | VishvAdthakkar | 61 | view |
- Nowadays the crime rate is increasing especially among teenagers What are the reasons behind it How can we reverse this trend What punishment methods should we used 79
- Nowadays online education has become popular as more institutes and companies are offering courses online However many people prefer the traditional classroom training or study Disciss the advantages and disadvantages of both methods 89
- You share a parking area with several neighbours and have recently started having problems explain Ghr problems suggesting ways to help situation proposing a possible meeting 72
- For school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Countries are becoming more more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the worldIs this a positive or negative development? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as, on top of that, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 7.85571142285 280% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2074.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 383.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41514360313 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87857320469 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477806788512 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 617.4 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3303344024 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5294117647 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8823529412 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289095818339 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110703200289 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533678033207 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185263813629 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479155057012 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.