Schooling is no longer necessary, since more and more information is accessible on the Internet, and students can study just as well at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The modern world has experienced considerable change since the advent of the internet. However, there remains certain discrepancy as to whether the overall impact of this revolutionized technology has been advantageous or disadvantageous to the sustainable growth of the civilized society in general, and especially to the educational system and modern schooling in particular.
While many put forward the opposite proposition that learners today can totally depends on the information updated on the Internet, I am deeply convinced that the pros and cons of this educational administration should be balanced from the educational perspective.
First and foremost, there is undeniable facts that this extraordinary technical and scientific achievement has revolutionized the way contemporary world communicates and progresses, as the result, beneficially impact to other fields such as education and research as well.
Obviously, Internet is considered as the perfect instrument of connection of multiple and accessible knowledge around the world.
It should be noted that education fields and research areas has been becoming dramatically convenient thanks to the advent of the internet.
This successful technical innovation offers us innumerable opportunities for learning processes and studying activities. The easy access and high speed of the Internet helps people straightforwardly enter a wide range of information with substantial quality and quantity.
As the result, students can obtain necessary knowledge from the internet around the world without any geographic barriers.
On the other hand, it would be incomplete without the discussion of the detrimental impacts of heavily relying on digital and social learnings instead of conventional school environment.
Not all sources of knowledge and information readily available on the Internet are fully validated in today chaotically digitalized network.
Apparently, it is very simple and convenience for anyone to create and upload any contents ranging from music to science experiment to any webpages via Internet. Whether young learner could be able to justify trustworthy sources of information to rely on is still a discussable topic among schoolteachers and parents.
Moreover, it is an indisputable argument that other practical knowledges, rules of thumbs and real-life experiences can be transferred better by knowledgeable and professional lecturers instead of self-learning method.
During the face to face teaching process in the traditional classroom, student can promptly communicate with their teacher to resolve all the unclear answers, therefore, cultivating their healthier learning attitude and gaining more comprehensive knowledge to make further advancement in their academic performance.
To recapitulate, Internet with its excellent amenities has incontestably offered human being a position of strength for the evolutionary development of the modern world education system.
Provided that school institution along with caring teachers should carefully evaluate the reliability and validity the sources of information and combine with classroom interaction and guidance, school learners will significantly benefit from the strategic hi-technological priorities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...ever, there remains certain discrepancy as to whether the overall impact of this revolutioniz...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 7, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun put seems to be countable; consider using: 'many puts'.
Suggestion: many puts
... modern schooling in particular. While many put forward the opposite proposition that l...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 21, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are undeniable facts'?
Suggestion: there are undeniable facts
...ional perspective. First and foremost, there is undeniable facts that this extraordinary technical and s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, while, as to, in general, in particular, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 8.3376753507 312% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2803.0 1615.20841683 174% => OK
No of words: 459.0 315.596192385 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.10675381264 5.12529762239 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37943260623 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 176.041082164 153% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58605664488 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 869.4 506.74238477 172% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.8592164892 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.882352941 106.682146367 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05882352941 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 14.0 4.38176352705 320% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144143894525 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0453432615614 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0240065607809 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0487796854528 0.151304729494 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222466565151 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.8 13.0946893788 159% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 18.69 50.2224549098 37% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.4 11.3001002004 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.45 12.4159519038 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.13 8.58950901804 130% => OK
difficult_words: 179.0 78.4519038076 228% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.78957915832 174% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.