Science tells us about the activities which are good for health and which are bad. Millions of people all over the world knows this and still do un healthy activities. Why do you this this is and what can be done to change it.
From a psychological point of view, having inter-personal connections is a vital need for humans. Although a flock of people holds that people had better select friends with similar beliefs, others disagree with this view and emphasize the positive impacts of disagreement in relations. There are strong views on both sides, and I will explain.
On the one hand, those supporting the idea of similarity believe that humans have an inherent tendency to achieve others compliment and confirmation. Hence, connection with bodies having opposite views may be not delightful for them, and it is possible that in some cases, they rebel against each other and flatten their relationships. However, when relations are created based on similarities, it can give both sides the opportunity to have supports in their opinions which escalates their self-confidence. Moreover, having similar beliefs leads to similar experiences. As a result, other lessons can hinder them from making mistakes in an identical situation which is time, energy and money-saving.
On the other hand, a cohort of people argue that a prized aspect of having friends who think differently and have various insights is they can optimize people’s outlook on life. oppositions may reveal some sides of opinions people cannot consider. So, by appraising all domains of decision, the results will be more reliable. For instance, if a person with a science background has a plan to produce a device, a friend who has a clear understanding of marketing is able to prevent his friend bankruptcy. Thus, people with different ideas and knowledge can complete each other and have a significant influence on their success.
In conclusion, from my point of view, both similarity and opposition are vital factors for making good friendships in order that people can advocate and prevent each other in all situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 184, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Oppositions
...optimize people's outlook on life. oppositions may reveal some sides of opinions peopl...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3288590604 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98346870885 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590604026846 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5547522382 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.428571429 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112940951868 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0383740305151 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.026835821425 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0741776869687 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.010549940653 0.056905535591 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.