Science will soon make people live up to 100 or even 200 years. Some believe this is a good thing while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Modern science will soon extend the average life of humans to 100 years and above. Some would argue that this development will bring benefits. Others, however, say otherwise. While reaching over 100 years old allows children and parents to stay together longer, I believe that this development will put a huge strain on younger generations.
On the one hand, people support the scientific advance to increase life expectancy because they want to stay alive and live with their families for a longer period. Regularly, people will die at the age of 70 and they therefore only have around 50 years living with their children if they have family in their 20s. Hence, when people reach beyond this limit, they will be able to have more time with their offspring. For example, a survey showed that 80% of residents in Ho Chi Minh City desire to have extended years with their families. However, I think that this development will bring burdens to children.
On the other hand, some people do not believe that this scientific achievement is a good thing because they are afraid of the strains put on younger generations. In other words, older people living longer means that children will have to work harder in order to earn money and support them while they also have to spend more time looking after their parents at home. For instance, a study on five families with members above 105 years old in Vietnam indicated that the second generation felt extremely overwhelmed with the burden to make incomes and take care of their elderly at the same time. Therefore, I believe that people should not be forced to live up to 100 years.
In conclusion, although it helps parents and children stay longer together, increasing humans’ life span will only put more burdens on the shoulders of the young.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, look, second, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87947882736 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39514924636 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537459283388 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1941332547 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9285714286 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4285714286 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20986345808 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0862872342888 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688921098801 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129910782363 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0808258476499 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.