Science will soon make people live up to 100 or even 200 years. Some believe this is a good thing while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Life expectancy become increasingly prominent for the developed counties.it is claimed that people could live up for a centuries which is now science concentrate on.it is clear some people would like to have long-lasting life while others argue that the world become more overpopulated and the health care would an issue for such a phenomena. In my opinion, it is a good idea if people live more than centuries because this means that we are living in an ecosystem which consider all the facets of life.
To begin with, human always looking for a mysterious formula to have more life. Because, more people lose their faith and they believe that there is no other world exist if you are dying. Thus, they become materialist and try to control their body shape and put more effort on science to overcome their destiny. Likewise, the lifestyle have changed drastically, and human empower themselves by technology. Nowadays, there are different nutrition exist and people actually understand what they are feeding. This means that people are now more aware about their routines in compare of twenty decades ago. So people have now believe that their life is now on their hand if they follow-up the science rules.
On the other hand, if people don’t die, it would cause some difficulties for nations. First, in western countries still healthcare is an issue even for the young generation. The cost of curing is now extremely high. Besides, food shortages or services for old people are scarce around the globe. For instance, in one study outline that if you are getting old then probably need more feed. So that if more aged people live in the country there so the cost of living become higher due to some facilities which mature people need. So it is better to think about the infrastructure of this phenomena before life expectancy.
In sum, if science would bring some unexpected formula for people who would like to have more life it isn’t bad at all. Because life style have changed and people are now have access to more food and information than before. But it should take the cost of old people in to the consideration if nations have plan to exceed the life expectancy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a century' or simply 'centuries'?
Suggestion: a century; centuries
...s claimed that people could live up for a centuries which is now science concentrate on.it ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 331, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a phenomenon' or simply 'phenomena'?
Suggestion: a phenomenon; phenomena
...the health care would an issue for such a phenomena. In my opinion, it is a good idea if pe...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 623, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'believed'.
Suggestion: believed
... twenty decades ago. So people have now believe that their life is now on their hand if...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 587, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...er to think about the infrastructure of this phenomena before life expectancy. In ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 313, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'planned'.
Suggestion: planned
...in to the consideration if nations have plan to exceed the life expectancy.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, but, first, if, likewise, look, so, still, then, thus, while, for instance, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1819.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86363636364 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52600787347 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 592.2 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0705010959 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7368421053 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6842105263 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47368421053 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162408088916 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530450812128 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445647402981 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108534352139 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370893785133 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.