Scientists agree that many people are eating too much junk food and it is damaging their health. Some people think that this problems can be solved by educating people to eat less junk food. Other people believe that education will not work.
Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion.
From the past few decades, the consumption of fast food has been increased briskly as more and more people are getting dependent on former. Some people advocate that teaching the deteriorating effects of junk food can make people to avoid them while there are many others who believe that this will not be effective as dependancy on such types of food has been increased and establishments should try to improve the quality of fast foods. Both the opinions are supported with facts, hence, should be scrutinised before passing any conviction.
Admittedly, providing useful information about the nutrients contents can help to solve the problem upto some extent. Educating people with the intake of various types of fats will also help to deal with obesity which is a curse to our society. Furthermore, educating about the negative effects of the fast foods will help to develop fear in the mind and perspective about them can be changed. Eventheless, by the butterfly effect of education, people will share such details with others and it will become easier to stop the consumption of fast foods.
However, people have busy schedule and they do not have enough time to cook food for themselves. Because of hectic life, they prefer to pick food from the various food outlets. Despite the knowledge about deteriorating effects, they do not have healthy options but to continue with the junk foods. Apart from that, the such foods are very cheap as compare to the healthy food. Due to economical reasons, people will always opt fast foods.
Having dwelled on such thoughts, it is clear that educating people about the ill-effects will only be a temporary solution and governments should need to take strong actions such as licenses for food outlets in order to curb obesity and other problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 385, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
... as compare to the healthy food. Due to economical reasons, people will always opt fast fo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, well, while, apart from, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02006688963 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55761673048 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548494983278 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.6196679998 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.461538462 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15384615385 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340102595582 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118933684346 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662092746704 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208736565329 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468661724095 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.