Scientists believe that the world is in danger due to environmental changes Some people say that personal lifestyle changes should be made to reduce the damage to environment while others think that the government should do something to help Discuss both

Essay topics:

Scientists believe that the world is in danger due to environmental changes.
Some people say that personal lifestyle changes should be made to reduce
the damage to environment, while others think that the government should
do something to help. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Climate and environmental changes have adverse effects on human health, safety and ecosystem. I think that human actions and organised lifestyle can affect the environment in a positive way.

Undoubtedly, the government plays a major role on a global level by implementing laws for both corporations and individuals. These laws will affect the environment globally. It is also responsible for educating the people about the climate and environment policies. Education increases the quality of society and makes them more responsible. It will also make people equipped with strategies towards development of a healthy lifestyle.

Nevertheless, humans cannot detach themselves as their activities are directly related to environmental factors. For instance individuals can contribute on a large scale through waste management. Discarding daily waste in a proper manner helps in keeping the surroundings clean and increases the opportunity of recycling.

Furthermore, around the world deforestation is increasing on a rapid rate. This means less trees will expose the land directly to sun light thus resulting in quick evaporation of natural water. Deforestation will also kill the animals, insects and other organisms which live on weed and trees. Additionally these days farmers use chemical fertilizers to increase the production of crops. These harmful chemicals are absorbed in the soil and water and pollute the climate.

To conclude, people can bring positive changes to the environment by properly managing their waste and protecting the natural resources by avoiding harmful chemicals. Every human being should understand that a better environment will protect us and the future generations.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ed lifestyle can affect the environment in a positive way. Undoubtedly, the government plays a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 220, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper manner" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...aste management. Discarding daily waste in a proper manner helps in keeping the surroundings clean...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 87, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun trees is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... increasing on a rapid rate. This means less trees will expose the land directly to ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 295, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Additionally,
...organisms which live on weed and trees. Additionally these days farmers use chemical fertili...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, thus, for instance, i think

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75889328063 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12428029176 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.640316205534 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.3004096141 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.7058823529 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8823529412 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.29411764706 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146599581879 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0403879077258 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369379834631 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0790489906627 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491144852952 0.056905535591 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.34 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.54 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.