Scientists can increase people's lifespan to 100 years. Is this a good or bad thing?
Due to technological advancements, nowadays scientists claim that people can live up to 100 years. It is debatable whether this breakthrough would be beneficial or harmful. From my perspective, the increased lifespan of humans would lead to both environmental and economical problems in the world.
One major argument to support my opinion is the increase in population on the earth, which would cause a threat to natural habitat, as deforestation would escalate. Thus, more species of flora and fauna would become extinct. Moreover, there would be more usage of resources and an increase in pollution, eventually damaging the environment and the scarcity of resources. To exemplify, the increased use of non-renewable resources such as coal, petroleum produces greenhouse gases, as a result, global warming rises.
Furthermore, longer life means less availability of employment to the younger generation and more poverty. Consequently, numerous unemployed youngsters could get inclined towards crimes and drugs to earn their livelihood. A study by The Times shows that about 64% of the criminals are less than 35 years old, out of which 30-35% commit crimes to draw money. With the increase in crime rates, harmony in the world could be jeopardized.
To conclude, the increased lifespan is not advantageous for people due to environmental drawbacks like over-population, threats to nature, resource depletion, and economical limitations such as unemployment, impoverishment, social conflicts, and so on. In my point of view, living for 10 decades would alleviate the thrill and excitement of life and would make it boring and more predictable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 265, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...ns would lead to both environmental and economical problems in the world. One major arg...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, if, moreover, so, thus, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54545454545 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25420087058 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.652173913043 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5384615385 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.923076923 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46153846154 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16222335704 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0514836142414 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565875500299 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0996109290499 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760541968801 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.