Several languages die every year. Many people feel this is a positive trend and that a world with fewer languages promotes harmony and understanding between people. Analyze both sides of this argument and provide your opinion.
Provide specific examples and explanation to support your answer.
Language is the pivotal vessel by which people communicate with each other. Each year, several languages become extinct, which is considered a positive trend by some people since it results in a world with better harmony between its dwellers. I oppose this belief due to several reasons which will be discussed in this essay.
To begin with, the loss of a language means losing the history of the nation who used to speak that language. Important events and anecdotes of a nation, which happened in the past, are passed through generations by many vessels, such as books or poems. However, language plays the most significant role in doing what was said by provers or common folk stories. Thus, what is actually happening when a language is evading is not only just extinction of some words and grammars, but the enriched history of a nation, which undoubtedly is a great loss. This matter can simply be exemplified by the book named “Shahnameh”, which consists of poems in Persian, helping save the language as well as the history of Persians.
Moreover, fewer languages result in a less astonishing world. One of the most fascinating beauties of mankind is the variety in people and societies. What distinguishes a society is the culture if that society, which is saved and passed through by proverbs and expressions. Therefore, when a language is lost, the culture of speakers of that language is gone, being a fiasco without a doubt.
Despite what was said, it must be taken into account that fewer languages have helped humans to advance in many aspects, such as science, in a faster pace nowadays. In the past, people were forced to learn many languages and dialects if they wanted to communicate with other people from other parts of the globe. However, nowadays, eradication of several languages has removed the burden of learning so many languages, easing up the communication between humans. As a result, humans cooperate better due to better communication and understanding, leading to higher rate of growth in every aspect.
To sum up, even though death of several languages has aided humans in achieving advancements, it is a negative trend. Every time a language dies, a culture and history of a nation dies with it.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1880.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 375.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01333333333 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85028622344 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546666666667 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7178514797 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.444444444 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278248694417 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0908260151095 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059696045659 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166398735689 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603383913229 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.