Smacking children is the best form of discipline. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
These days children are becoming less well-behaved. Some parents believe that using physical violence on their children is the best way to asset discipline. This essay will argue that beating children with bad behaviour is entirely unnecessary instead there are alternative strategies to keep control over them.
Adults find it hard to discipline their descendants so they find physical punishment is the most effective method. Some children are really firm and fearless which gives parents no choice but slap them to show power. They find it is working strategy as in a result children keep themselves back being actually scared of parents. For instance, a survey in Paide has shown that over 700 parents have punished their children physically due to bad behaviour like smoking or not satisfying learning outcomes. It is understandable why some parents resolve problems with smacking their children as it stops unacceptable behaviour although there are other methods to asset discipline.
Despite what some parents believe in using physical violence to form discipline on their children is actually the disrespectful and wrong way to raise a child. Abusing children physically is humiliating and embarrassing which could lower the self-esteem and result in mental problems like depression. Nobody likes to be smacked at home and there are some alternative solutions to use. For example, parents could take something important away that belongs to a child, like pocket-money, a toy or ban them to meet their good friends. These would be much more effective and friendlier approaches to keep children motivated and disciplined.
In conclusion, this essay argued that people who smack their children are trying to show their power but it could lower a child’s self-respect and result in depression. Instead of physical punishment, adults might take something morally important away that keeps the children obedient.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, really, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47157190635 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87440634429 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548494983278 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.236723268 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.066666667 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86666666667 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15078192595 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575862875207 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413847894091 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102390697926 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0197781012041 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.