Science could help people live up to 100 or 200 years. Would it be a good or bad development? Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Technology and science have developed to an extent that people’s longevity has increased profoundly. It might be in the future we can live one or even two centuries. It would be great development for technology but in my opinion, it is not good development as it will lead to overpopulation and therefore cause a lot of trouble to the environment.
On one hand, tripling our average years of life gives people time to increase knowledge and ability to create science. In other words, the new generations brain has become in time more developed, so there is a possibility to rise more geniuses for the centuries than ever before. Scientists who could bring technology in the whole new level. For example, in long perspective there would be several working robots, airplanes without pilots and flying cars. Instead of mobile phones people read each other mind and communicate without the words.
On the other hand, if people would live so long the globe will be overcrowded evoking natural disasters. Population is increasing rapidly 83 million people annually and living longer means also more children. Unfortunately, too many people will unwillingly overproduce products which brings along lots of rubbish, exhaust gases and therefore reduces the pure air. In fact, several natural disasters will occur like tsunamis and earthquakes. For example, global warming is already happening and to help it, all the people need to co-operate.
In conclusion, living couple of centuries has plus and minus sides, the good thing is that technology would turn another page making our lives easier, however, longevity would face us with overpopulation and dangerous disasters.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...be in the future we can live one or even two centuries. It would be great develop...
^^
Line 3, column 359, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: ,  
...logy in the whole new level. For example, in long perspective there would be seve...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: ,  
...ple need to co-operate. In conclusion, living couple of centuries has plus and...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46212121212 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22758392297 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655303030303 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.5335835267 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.923076923 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53846153846 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218119849132 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701822979219 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505765317083 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132802844198 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517326161426 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.