Science could help people live up to 100 or 200 years. Would it be a good or bad development? Discuss both views and give your opinion.
average life expectancy is reducing by day. However, it is believed that application of science knowledge, such as DNA modification, could prolong lives. I am of the opinion that living longer will be dangerous; except good health is ensured.
To start with, increasing human existence to two centuries has lots of benefits. Firstly, people can have enough time to achieve their aims and goals. As it is now, most people feel that life is too short, so if they have the opportunities of more years alive, they will be able to fulfill their dreams. For instance, one could have up to ten different doctorate degrees as they wish, if they live long enough. In addition, having more time will ensure people can enjoy their life achievements. it is not uncommon for workers to die immediately after their retirement, which means that enjoying their benefits for s not possible. this will not be an issue if they have over 100 years to live.
Conversely, doubling life expectancy could also be a negative development. because of the challenges of life, some people, who have had really difficult circumstances, will want it all to end at an average time. Evidently, economic recession has raised suicide rates in Nigeria. this means that living for more decades will only extend their suffering. also, with old age comes several health problems, which include hypertension and diabetes. so extending lives will increase risks of such diseases.
Concluding, although science could help add more years to people's lives in order to have more time to meet up with their plans, and enjoy what they have acquired; I believe it will be a dangerous trend because it can mean more suffering for people with bad situations, as well as increase risks for illnesses associated with old age.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Average
average life expectancy is reducing by day. How...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 495, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ople can enjoy their life achievements. it is not uncommon for workers to die imme...
^^
Line 2, column 630, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ying their benefits for s not possible. this will not be an issue if they have over ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 75, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...y could also be a negative development. because of the challenges of life, some people,...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...on has raised suicide rates in Nigeria. this means that living for more decades will...
^^^^
Line 3, column 353, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...cades will only extend their suffering. also, with old age comes several health prob...
^^^^
Line 3, column 444, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...hich include hypertension and diabetes. so extending lives will increase risks of ...
^^
Line 3, column 501, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s will increase risks of such diseases. Concluding, although science could help ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, firstly, however, if, really, so, well, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96979865772 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67101657327 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593959731544 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 64.3860007566 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1176470588 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5294117647 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41176470588 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15419716868 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505409858483 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507880357762 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110305315971 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401209174055 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.