In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home withother old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimesthe government has to pay for this care.Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family?Give

Essay topics:

In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with

other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes

the government has to pay for this care.

Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

In Britain, over a certain age of people often go to live in a retirement home with other old people where they are looked after by nurses. It is sometimes for the government's responsibility to pay for this care. In my opinion, this care should be paid by the government. This essay will discuss the reasons and give relevant examples for that.

Older people should get benefits from the government including the care for the retirement home. Most people work for the whole life-time and pay taxes for the government. At the moment these taxes do not include the pay for older people who need special care onwards certain age. In fact, the government should create a new tax system that includes a small percent for elder people care. Some countries have an aging population which can be a hard problem for the whole state to deal with. For instance, Japan has an aging population and due to that, they are closing every year 400 primary schools to replace them with nursing homes and adult daycare centers.

Younger people pay an important role in taking care of older family members. Although sending older people into an elder home can be financially really hard there can be other solutions. For example, in Japan, the government encourages people to have three-generation households which means that youngsters are taking care of older people. This can be an option when the older person is still in good health otherwise they need special care by a nurse all the time. Thinking about future there should be more convenient facilities offering care for elder people that are paid at least half by government and half by family members. This makes it easier to manage financially.

In conclusion, people in the older age need some special care and this can be paid or supported by the government. If a person’s health is still good it can be taken into consideration that youngsters are taking care of the older family members.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 165, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...fter by nurses. It is sometimes for the governments responsibility to pay for this care. In...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 78, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...in taking care of older family members. Although sending older people into an elder home...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, really, so, still, at least, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1622.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87087087087 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58181425822 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495495495495 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.506215766 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1111111111 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72222222222 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.435189150712 0.244688304435 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155225986461 0.084324248473 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0890412344372 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288980413279 0.151304729494 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142105060921 0.056905535591 250% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.