In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with
other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes
the government has to pay for this care.
Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family?
In recent years, the old-age home concept is gaining a great deal of attention throughout society and it has been a bone of contention among the critics regarding who is going to pay for the service. While some people contend that the government must take care of this issue by allocating a dedicated fund, however, I would contend that support from the family will be more customized and practical.
To begin with, the old-aged people are undoubtedly part of the family and for their livelihood, the family members must have some responsibilities both from an emotional angle as well as from the legal aspects. Therefore, whenever, they are facing some sort of detachment from the core family due to staying at the old-age home, a customized and focused care from the family may give them a psychological relief to those unfortunate grey-haired individuals. This can be exemplified by the newly developed system in Australia where the families are abode by the laws to maintain the expense who are residing at an old-age home. A survey team from some global NGOs interviewed those residents and found they are 28% more satisfied to have a minimum financial attachment with the family, resulting in a more peaceful situation for them at least. However, before this new system emerged, the expense was carried out by the government and at that time satisfaction level was only 2%, claimed by those NGOs. Moreover, every individual is different and so their need is. Therefore, fulfilling those needs might be more logical to handled by the nearest one, and in this case, the family itself can be considered as the closest point to contact. Therefore, the governmental help which might be generalized to all old-age people found to be less effective to satisfy them indeed. This has been observed in some cases in the UK where the state is funding the expenses and found to be useless in more than 50% old-home residents as their needs versus the services sanctioned from the government is totally unmatched.
However, some critics may bring the issue of affordability of the family on the discussion table and hence for those selective case, the governmental subsidies can be a resolution. Therefore, from all aspects, the family members must pay the bills from the moral and legal point of view excluding some serious situations where the government should interfere.
To recapitulate, the roles and responsibilities of the family cannot be omitted and those are staying the last few days of their life at the old-age home, expects a lot from the families. To me, the governmental steps might be considered for a few cases, but the major bindings should be on to the family.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 177, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...sibilities both from an emotional angle as well as from the legal aspects. Therefore, when...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, at least, sort of, as well as, in some cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 13.1623246493 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2240.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 450.0 315.596192385 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97777777778 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79692600219 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493333333333 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 719.1 506.74238477 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 12.0 2.52805611222 475% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.7210457851 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.0 106.682146367 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.1428571429 20.7667163134 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247799021723 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0953051898569 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387435946832 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159867958819 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583547719303 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.