Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Smoking poses a great danger to humans. Smoking not only causes harm to the person who smokes but also to the person who stands or seats nearby them. Some have therefore suggested banning the use of smoking in public places. This essay will discuss why I completely agree that a ban is the best way to curb the damages caused by smoking.
The main reason why smoking ought to be forbidden from public places is that they are causing major health issues. People who smoke cigarettes regularly can end up having lung cancer which can result in death. Also, inhaling cigarette smoke passively has been shown in many studies to cause cancers in the lungs of those who are in the same room or outdoor space as people smoking. For instances, most researches show that a large portion of lung cancer patients has been a regular smoker or passive smoker. Furthermore, Smoking can cause heart attacks to both smokers and non-smokers that can negatively impact our health. Since smoking is a major factor for health diseases, banning it would be a step in the right direction at least.
A secondary reason is that banning smoking can help us reducing environmental pollution. Cigarette ashes are not easily bio-degradable, and they can pollute the air, soil, and waterways. To protect the environment, many countries have introduced fines for smokers who smoke in public places. As a result, it is discouraging them to smoke outside which can protect the environment from getting polluted by the harmful toxins of cigarettes.
In conclusion, this essay discussed both the health and environmental impacts of a ban on smoking in public places. Banning it can protect the health of passive smokers as well as the environment. In my opinion, this simple step can have far-reaching consequences and the sooner more countries adopt the policy, the better.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 56, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[9]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to reduce' or 'reduce'.
Suggestion: to reduce; reduce
...son is that banning smoking can help us reducing environmental pollution. Cigarette ashe...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, second, so, therefore, well, at least, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1550.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01618122977 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67867735381 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553398058252 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2985810348 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.1764705882 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1764705882 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64705882353 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322253219493 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115352729001 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711517374042 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211234436844 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0709577599887 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.