Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Smoking is still a common habit in all countries through the degree to which it is accepted varies considerably. As it is harmful not only to smokers but also to those who do not smoke, many argue it should be prohibited in public areas. I completely agree with banning smoking in such spaces and will explain why in this essay.

The most persuasive reason why non-smokers should not be compelled to breathe in the air from other’s cigarettes is that this can cause lung cancer and asthma. Indeed, inhaling cigarette smoke passively has been show in many studies to cause deposits of cancer-producing tar in the lungs of those who are in the same room or outdoor space as people smoking. This is even more damaging for children, as their exposure to these harmful toxins occurs when their lungs are still developing, thereby increasing their risk of being asthmatic. Clearly, nonsmokers should not face this danger in public places.

Aside from the health risks of public-smoking, the issue of freedom is important. Everyone is entitled to breathe clean air and it is incumbent on those we elect to maintain a healthy environment for all. This includes public areas such as outside cafes, parks, and playgrounds where we all should be able to gather without fear of breathing polluted air. In Australia, for instance, although some businesses can set their own rules, smoking is now illegal at public transport stations to prevent drifting smoke from affecting non-smoking passengers. Such a ban, rather than allocating certain smoke-free areas is the only way to ensure compliance and protection for all.

To conclude, there is no doubt that smoking has no place in areas open to the public. Not only can it increase the risk of harmful diseases, but it also limits our freedom

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, for instance, no doubt, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97666666667 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73117597789 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2951847503 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.642857143 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07142857143 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342388630136 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118694856424 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109373414325 0.0667982634062 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222413447295 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102170554261 0.056905535591 180% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.