some believe that modern technology has made people less socially active while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In today's modern-life, technology has bought many revolutionary changes in our social life. Some people assert that the technological advancement has affected people's social activities negatively, while many others argue that it is bringing positive edge to our social behavior. Personally, I'm in favor of prior view.
Convincing arguments can be made how modern technology such as internet is making us less active socially. First of all, with invention of internet people started using the technology without understanding it's side-effects and now they not address the ill-effects of technology as problem as they are unaware about it. For example, social websites and messaging provided a comfortable platform to everybody so people started interacting virtually frequently as technology was new, as a result when they get bored with technology they stopped interactive virtually as well. Secondly, people started avoiding direct interaction by virtue of calls and started messaging each other which started to act negatively on our communication skills. Furthermore, social websites provided a platform where people started to search new relationships rather than preserving and maintaining the existing.
Admittedly, technology facilitated to us in many ways as we can be in touch with distant family members and friends in no time by virtue of various platforms. But, it is possible without advanced technology as well, with the help of conventional methods such as writing letters or telephonic conversations. Hence, I believe technology is making us less socially active.
To sum up, from my perception, technology is a double edge sword which has bought many disadvantages with it like reducing peoples social interaction in-spite of providing us various platform to interact more.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 292, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...dge to our social behavior. Personally, Im in favor of prior view. Convincing a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, such as, as a result, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64206642066 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14305811055 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612546125461 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.2794147056 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.416666667 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258825063462 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102961490003 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762717964262 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155892531043 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0782767222665 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.