Many parents decide to stay home and take care of the family members instead of going out for work. Some people suggest that they should be paid by the government for doing that. Do you agree or disagree? Give reason for your answer and include example from your own experience.
In today's modern-society, parents generally opt out to stay at home to look after their children or elderly persons in-spite of having potential and educational qualifications to work. Many people assert that, those who sacrifice their career for family should get paid by government. However, I do not agree with this opinion as it is individuals choice to stay at home and it is difficult for government to monitor each family from this perception.
There are several reasons why not to pay those who stay at home and take care of their family members, First of all, it is individuals choice to give priority to work or to look after family. It takes immense pressure handling capabilities of parents those who take care of family members and work at the same time. They have to sacrifice their leisure and entertainment time in doing so. As a result, their children also understand the significance of hard work in their growing age. Family members also acknowledge and understand the efforts taken by parents which increases mutual respect and understanding in family.
Secondly, it is perfectly difficult for government to monitor and to identify the genuine cases where member of parents is unable to work because of family conditions. This may result into injustice to them who are working hard taking care of family and work together. To illustrate, those who are working hard and taking care of both the worlds will get discouraged if any such government policy is implemented. As a result, all parents will choose to be at home which will adversely affect government and national economy. Moreover, it will put additional burden on government budget. These are the factors that I think that should be considered .
To conclude, it does happens due to some unforeseen circumstances that parents had to stay at home to look after family. But getting paid by government is not right thing to do as it is their own choice and government should not be held payable for it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 647, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...s that I think that should be considered . To conclude, it does happens due to so...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, i think, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92814371257 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80050277127 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508982035928 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4144147965 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.875 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347875419888 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113127322367 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620626568004 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223887340477 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392005805849 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.