Some businesses observe that new employees who just graduated from a college or university seem to lack interpersonal skills needed for communication with their colleagues. What could be the reason for this? What solutions can help address this problem?
Communication skills are vital for an employee to survive in any organization. In the recent times, most of the corporate companies are recruiting fresh minds from the colleges who are not efficient in the interpersonal behaviour skills. This essay discusses the causes of this behaviour in the fresh graduates and possible solutions to overcome it.
In the study environment, students will focus mainly on the subject matter rather than the essential skills needed for their career progression. Pupils are forced by the parents and teachers to get good marks in the exam, due to this; students’ concentrates only on the educational subjects and become less proficient in the interpersonal skills. According to a recent study by a renowned magazine, 80% of the persons who are successful in their student life are facing difficulties in the business organizations, due to the lack of communication skills.
A possible solution to this problem would be implementing communication skills as a part of the curriculum from the college level. Special classes or training sessions could be arranged for the students to improve the skills which are essential for their effective communication with the colleagues in their organizations. The educational institution can arrange the guest lectures by Human Resource personnel from well-known organizations to indulge the practices into students by familiarizing them. For example, a survey by IBM indicates that the professionals who are trained in communication skills outperformed than the employees who are not trained.
To conclude, that lack of interpersonal skills in the fresh graduates leads to the ineffective workforce in the business. To eradicate this problem, the educational system has to be revamped to make the pupils become masters in the communication skills. This can be achieved by including communication skills as part of their academic curriculum.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53559322034 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31084938386 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518644067797 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6642715535 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.615384615 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.46153846154 7.06120827912 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382502297484 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136704514345 0.084324248473 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595646951382 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232389315341 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604714168012 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.