Some cities create new housing for their growing populations by constructing a smaller number of high-rise buildings. Other cities create more of low-rise buildings. Which solution is better, in your opinion?
As the population around the numerous demographics is soaring up, a few cities opt to establish skyscrapers to accommodate its residents while others still prefer traditional low-story buildings. Apparently, high-rise buildings are superior to their low-rise counterparts since the former renders affordable housing that too by saving the most essential resource of the contemporary world which is land.
Certainly, multi-story buildings outweigh 2 or 3 story building when it comes to providing less expensive housing options for potential buyers. Since unconventional tall architectural design has different price quotations depending upon the floor number a buyer is looking for, it makes owning a house reality for people with high to low budget. On the other hand, conventional fewer story buildings have almost the same price tag making it difficult to provide a wider range of sale quotations. For instance, when I was searching for a house in Mississauga, I came to know that buying an apartment in a 3 story would cost me double the price compared to having the same sized apartment in a skyscraper on 15th floor. Thus, by rendering house prices with remarkable different, these tall structures conquer their low story versions.
Additionally, being comprised of numerous floors, enables such buildings to accommodate a noteworthy amount of people combating the dire issue of land scarcity. While a low-rise residential building accommodates a few hundred people, a skyscraper can have thousands of people. As our land resources are becoming scarce, constructing vertical cities is the most efficient way to provide shelters to this increasing population as well as putting less pressure on land resources. Burj Khalifa, as an example, contains 72 floors which provide the ability to contain a town in it. Apparently, high-rise buildings are better than having fewer story buildings.
To conclude, in the twenty-first century when the unprecedented and ceaselessly growing population is readily consuming up the precious land resources, constructing vertical cities is the best way to handle the situation instead of erecting a lot of low rise buildings.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 834, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tures conquer their low story versions. Additionally, being comprised of numerou...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, if, look, so, still, thus, well, while, for instance, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1845.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52395209581 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11515543907 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61377245509 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.469119551 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.923076923 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6923076923 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301525502189 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104801919498 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585970089872 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18513225766 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400870682564 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.