Some cities have vehicle-free days when private cars, trucks and motorcycles are banned from the city center. People are encouraged to use public transportation such as buses, taxis and metro on vehicle-free days. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
It is often argued that the transportation is necessary to live our life to move different places easily. Some people might think that a few towns have a policy which personal vehicles are forbidden by council when they are operated. The citizens may be asked to take public transport on specific days. Although using private cars provide the comfort for inhabitants, I strongly think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. This essay will address the perspective of how vehicles influence people’s lifestyle.
First of all, people would live very flexible life when they use their own vehicles. When individuals drive their cars, they might reduce time consuming and the work efficiency may be improved. For example, when they use the private ones, they may arrive their destination quickly and then they would save the time for working effectively because the owned cars are fairly helpful to move. Thus, the flexibility of time makes their lifestyle efficiently.
On the other hand, there are some side effects when individuals do not take the public transportation. In other words, using private vehicles may deteriorate the environment in the society due to the creation of the emission gas a lot. Moreover, the congestion would be increased because of an abundance of cars on the road. However, when people take the buses or trains, our community would not be destroyed because of the lack of the harmful causes such as air pollution. Therefore, the number of citizens may need to avoid driving personal vehicles to prevent the deterioration of the environment.
In conclusion, in spite of the fact that the owned vehicles make people’s life comfortable, they must be encouraged to try taking public things to save the planet. It is also significant to maintain god atmosphere for the next generation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in other words, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19322033898 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85748034285 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572881355932 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1705109964 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.75 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4375 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3125 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201185416605 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657797868362 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422567332403 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12663521547 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559264014359 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.