Some countries achieve international sports by building specialized facilities to train top athletes, instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use. Do you think this is positive or negative development?
In a few states, specialized amenities are established to train only top players, so to accomplish international sports, rather than making sports facilities available to everyone. Personally, I believe that it is a positive development. this essay will first discuss the benefits of specifying certain services for top champions, followed by the reasoned conclusion.
To begin with, there are several rationales to justify this argument. On the first hand, providing high-quality and up-to-date facilities, only to best sportsmen will give them the opportunity to practice with their full potential in the best environment, thus representing the country by giving spectacular results. Secondly, it's good PR for a country to have the best sports complex and venues keeping up their name internationally. Considering a broader scope,, athletes, instead of going abroad, will be able to practice in their own country and thus will gain respect for their country in international sports by winning. consequently, other nations will also approach, to train their sportsmen. For Instance, China always remains high in standing in hosting the Olympic games and in setting records in many sports events, by allocating a huge amount of national funds on professional sports instead of public sports facilities.
however, In spite of that, there still exists a wide range of drawbacks. Firstly, lack of sports amenities for public can lead to discouragement among people and children from being physically active and sporty. thus, causing a range of health problems among people. To illustrate, as people will find it difficult to work out or do a particular sport, as a result, they will become lethargic.
To conclude, although this policy is not without its drawback, however, allocating high-quality sports facilities for only top athletes is an option worth mentioning.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 239, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ieve that it is a positive development. this essay will first discuss the benefits o...
^^^^
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the best'.
Suggestion: to the best
...quality and up-to-date facilities, only to best sportsmen will give them the opportunit...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 463, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive commas
Suggestion: ,
...rnationally. Considering a broader scope,, athletes, instead of going abroad, will...
^^
Line 3, column 628, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
...try in international sports by winning. consequently, other nations will also approach, to t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...instead of public sports facilities. however, In spite of that, there still exists a...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...om being physically active and sporty. thus, causing a range of health problems amo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, thus, for instance, as a result, in spite of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48788927336 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06978729982 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629757785467 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6168625873 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.285714286 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.78571428571 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252985245359 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747455427265 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572193875961 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146061793252 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427069119174 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.