In some countries children have very strict rules of behaviour, in other countries they are allowed to do almost anything they like. To what extent should children have to follow rules?
The behavior of an individual as an adult varies depending on several aspects. Of which, the way they are brought up is strenuously considered a pivotal factor. Kids in some countries are made to obey strict rules whereas other nations are liberal of the behavioral rules. I take the side of the countries who adopt latter method and opine children should be allowed to enjoy their freedom and at the same time be monitored on their social behavior.
It is a significant point that behavior should be categorically molded at a nascent and growing age. Children inculcate manners that were nurtured at a learning age. So, it is the responsibility of the parents to render their offspring to hone their interpersonal skills right from schooling. Kids from certain countries, raised with strict behavioral patterns may experience behavioral and cultural differences at a global platform which may lead them to be less competent around others.
Whereas In several western countries, kids are allowed to enjoy adequate freedom with a sense of good behavior. They do not have a difficulty in acclimatizing themselves to the changes and patterns of behavior across the world. A study on behavioral patterns by the renowned psychologist Mr Ram from Cambridge University illustrates that children and adolescents from western countries where they are left upon their will, tend to transform to be global leaders when they enter adulthood. He supports the theory with prime examples of successful entrepreneurs like Bill gates and Mark Zuckerberg, who were college dropouts and were allowed to do what they wanted as teenagers by their parents.
To recapitulate, though the behavior of kids has be monitored on a constant note, the rules should not be hard enough hampering their social behavior and deteriorating their competency skills at a broad spectrum of global platforms, leaving them socially destitute. Instead, these rules should aid them to be responsible citizens with pleasant behavior and leading a successful career.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-31 | H@rry | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-07 | likiyash | 67 | view |
| 2018-01-12 | amar.goswami02@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2018-01-12 | amar.goswami02@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2017-02-07 | FaizalReza | 95 | view |
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.Discuss both these views a 61
- Nowadays food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live?Give reasons for your answer using your own ideas and experience.Write at least 250 words. 78
- You recently went shopping at the local supermarket When you got home and noticed your bill you found that you had been charged for items you did not purchase Write a letter to the supermarket manager explaining what has happened Tell the manager how you 73
- Some people use technology to take advice for their medical problems rather than seeing to doctor. Why this is so. It is positive or negative development according to you. 84
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 50, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...tulate, though the behavior of kids has be monitored on a constant note, the rules...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29411764706 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93620893847 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554179566563 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.2129943371 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.142857143 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0714285714 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.42857142857 7.06120827912 20% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204092551509 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731224110103 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594180664411 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128212398812 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743049624138 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.