Some countries encourage teenagers to have part-time job and see it as a good thing, while others disagree. Give your opinion and explain both views.
In modern times, various methods has been adopted for mental and physical development of teenagers around the globe. One of these adaptations is part-time jobs for teenagers. To explore more about this topic it is important to understand how this is effecting the life of a teenager? Every coin has two faces which means even the adaptation we are talking about has advantages and disadvantages based on which many countries encourage or discourage teenagers for part-time jobs.
On the first hand, countries who encourages teenager for part-time jobs believes that this allows teenager to understand the amount of dedication required to pull off any task assigned. Also, they learn to manage time and prioritization of activities. For instance, a teenager working at a pizza joint learns how to manage and prioritize the orders received. He also put efforts to deliver it to customer on time and with quality assured.
On the other hand, there are many countries who disagrees with the above facts, they believe this kind of gesture puts burden on teenager. They think that it creates a stressed environment around the teenager which they might not be able to handle. Also, teenager will be left out with no time for extra curricular activities which are important for their growth, for example, a teenager will feel pressurized if he has to attend school, job and then karate classes. Concentration power of teenager will also reduce which will result in bad performance in tasks.
In my opinion, we should encourage teenagers for part-time jobs because that is how they will understand that it is not easy to earn money. It will help them to develop attributes like independence, smartness and maturity. With all the characteristics gained from the part-time job they will be able to have a better future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, then, as to, for example, for instance, kind of, talking about, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08026755853 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8043912023 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7322643218 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.266666667 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.13333333333 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204905712918 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765248483299 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598183147876 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142447616391 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031870428455 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.