Some countries today have passed laws against smoking tobacco in public buildings such as offices and restaurants. Other countries have no intention of doing this.
Consider the possible arguments on both sides of this debate, and reach your own conclusion on which side you favour.
Although the law prohibiting smoking in public places has already been passed in some
countries, others are not going to intent this law. In my opinion, I consider that this measure is a must, and all countries should introduce anti-tobacco law in public buildings.
On the one hand, some countries decided to stop the tendency of smoking in a work places and restaurants and I agree. Smoking tobacco is known as one of the most dangerous habits not only for smokers, but also for non-smoking people. As people we do not work and relax apart from each other, so being the part of smoking community will directly influence people's health in a negative way. The cancer, for instance, usually appears among people who prefer to smoke. And it is disturbing when you have to be surrounded by smoking people while working or just having a meal in a cafe. Furthermore, workers will spend their breaks doing another activity, such as communicating with co-workers, walking the street or just drinking a tea.
On the other hand, there are some countries which do not ban smoking in public places. One possible reason for this is that the government do not have any rights to forbid individuals addicted to smoking stop doing it because it seems like discrimination. Without this right people may feel their weakness compared to others and organize the strike against this law. Another reason for having no intention of implementing this law might be the possibility of decrease in number of people visiting places marked as 'non-smoking area'. This decrease in restaurant visitors will provide law income for the holders.
In conclusion, while countries may vary in their policy, I think that prohibiting smoking in public places will prevent the possibility of having cancer and provide an opportunity for workers to spend their free time in a healthier way
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Although the law prohibiting smoking in public p...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...c places has already been passed in some countries, others are not going to inten...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Countries
...aces has already been passed in some countries, others are not going to intent this la...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... will directly influence peoples health in a negative way. The cancer, for instance, usually appe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, may, so, while, apart from, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1550.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70976382351 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554838709677 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9319993578 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.714285714 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35714285714 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349423108058 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12979263103 0.084324248473 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703325693796 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20475626145 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0839670549115 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.