Some employers want to be able to contact their staff at all times, even on holidays.Does this development have more disadvantages than advantages?

Essay topics:

Some employers want to be able to contact their staff at all times, even on holidays.
Does this development have more disadvantages than advantages?

In the time of cut-throat competition, employers are chasing their workforce to be in office round the clock all throughout the year to churn out extra hours. While this strategy may work in some cases, I think it has more negatives than positives. Also, the trend will eliminate work life balance and may affect health in some cases.

On the one hand, it is observed that the employees who are asked to support office while they are on vacations feel more exhausted, frustrated and tortured. Sometimes, it forces them to take the decision of leaving the firm, resulting in loss of experienced workforce for the firm. This trend negatively affects people’s lives too. Since they are not out of the work, that leads to lesser time with family and friends. Thus, creating a vacuum between the relationships and leading to unnecessary misunderstandings between them.

On the other hand, some organizations work round the clock to support their multi-national clients. For instance, outsourcing and call center companies have processes set up where people are contacted even when they are on a break. This maintains normalcy in the project. Further, one is up to date with the current status and can immediately start when he/she returns from holidays.

To sum up, it is need of the hour for the firms to contact their employees when they are on a break. However, it is recommended to let them enjoy their holidays to keep them energized and enthusiastic towards work.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, thus, while, for instance, i think, in some cases, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1237.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 246.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02845528455 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83178154423 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60162601626 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 369.9 506.74238477 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.2604990029 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3571428571 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5714285714 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161399302091 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501718778138 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419398960032 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.094356170081 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516585029915 0.056905535591 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.