Some fast food restaurants and supermarkets support the school in order to promote their products. Is it positive or negative development for school and students?
In this challenging world, every businessmen are trying to promote their products or services in every possible way to amplify their business. Some schools believe that earning by promoting fast food outlets and supermarkets makes a constructive progress whilst some think it is deleterious for school and students. In my opinion, this statement has both positive and negative consequences and I tend to believe that it can affect both, negatively and positively for several reasons.
First and foremost, extra funding helps for development of school and aiding students with better facilities. Schools can bring added facilities to students like digital boards, computer rooms, library, hiring qualified teachers for teaching foreign language and arts, introducing martial arts. This investment presumably will promote children’s progress during studying in school and apparently they will have a much more competitive advantage than other pupils. Indeed teachers will also be motivated by getting well paid. Additionally, schools can raise the spirits of students and prepare them to take part in competitive exams held between different schools and arrange prominent coaching in these competitions through skilled coach by paying a hefty amount of salary to them. Furthermore, super markets or fast food joints can attract new customers and stimulate their sales.
Nowadays, instant food is cheaper than school canteen food, however, we cannot overlook the negative impacts of the same. Firstly, fast foods are rich in carbohydrates and sodium which hampers the health of growing child. These foods act like slow poison to deteriorate child’s health and later in life can convert in chronic diseases like Cancer. It is human nature to get addicted to bad things faster, similarly, children can get addicted to such foods which are not meant for daily consumption.
In conclusion, the health of youth is wealth of nation and this must have utmost importance. Government should put restrictions on such goods which are harmful for students in long run. Schools should adopt other methods to raise funds which are not at the cost of student’s health.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 470, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...ompetitive advantage than other pupils. Indeed teachers will also be motivated by gett...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, similarly, so, well, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50447761194 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79505020277 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644776119403 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.844448377 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.25 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9375 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1875 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370737291994 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104780926296 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.084606822887 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206310014301 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0959188151736 0.056905535591 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.