Some parents believe that children should be given more time for their studies. While other parents think that they should be given more time for the physical activities in early ages.
Parents have different priorities what should be more beneficial for their child in their early ages. There are two main factors on which should emphasize more for their children’s good. While, allocating more time for children studies is essential, I agree with the idea if giving enough time to physical activities as well.
Some parents believe that, study should be the integral priority for their children, and there are some logical reasons behind this idea which approves it. Firstly, it develops learning skills of a child in early age. For instance, learning different languages in school. Secondly, acquiring more knowledge enables a child to compete on higher level in today’s world. Finally, knowledge transform a person into a good human being and it also leafs to stable life for a child later on.
However, I understand the validity of a thought of some other parents to focus more or equally on physical activities of a child in their early life. There are some reasons which makes this view sensibly practical. In particular, physical activities develops the body and keeps a child active. For example, if a child doesn’t take part in physical activities, this might affect his health or studies too. Physical activities can lead to a good career later on. Alternatively, it helps brain to function more efficiently.
In conclusion, after discussing the above I came to the point that as it is important to give more time to study, while the idea of giving enough time to physical activities is also a necessity for a child, and keeping the required balance of both will lead to successive growth of a child in every aspect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...more beneficial for their child in their early ages. There are two main factors o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03623188406 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74784863624 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539855072464 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.0866777623 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6666666667 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53333333333 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.434040518671 0.244688304435 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139978853805 0.084324248473 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110439212171 0.0667982634062 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281303898234 0.151304729494 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132373112472 0.056905535591 233% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.