Some parents believe that extra private lessons outside school hours, where students work alone with a teacher, can help them do better at school. Others disagree.
Discuss both the views and give your own opinion.
Many parents believe that the crowded environment in regular classrooms can have a negative impact on the academic performance of students. Hence they send them to private tuitions where the teacher can individually help them to study their lessons more effectively and perform better at school. However, others believe that private lessons outside school hours are burdensome to children and it can have a negative influence on their academic development.
Because of the constrains of time, the size of the syllabus and the number of students, school teachers may not be able to cater to the individual needs of all children who have different intellectual capacities. For instance, in regular classrooms, weaker students find it hard to grasp the formulas of mathematics and science, which makes these subjects difficult for them. Whereas, the teacher at a private tuition follows the pace of the student and makes sure that he is thorough with the lessons. This means that the teacher has sufficient time to repeat the lessons in case the student does not understand it, the first time. This gives greater confidence to such students and helps them to get superior grades in examinations.
On the other hand, private lessons outside school hours is considered, by many parents, as an intrusion into the time that children should engage in sports or other extracurricular activities. They believe that students are already stressed out after regular school hours and should be given time to relax, instead of taxing them again with more lessons. If they are forced into private tuitions they may develop a negative attitude toward studies, which would have detrimental effect on their academic performance. Moreover, private lessons outside school hours is very expensive and many parents would not be able to afford it.
After considering the positive and negative aspects of private tuitions, I suggest that intellectually weak students should get assistance form a private teacher, who would help them to perform better in school. But, on regular school days students should not be burdened with extra private lessons and the best way to do it is, to find a few hours during weekends. Although it may be financially burdensome for many parents, intellectually weak students would greatly benefit from private tuitions.
In conclusion, despite certain drawbacks, private tuition has enormous benefits for students, to perform well in their academics
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... the academic performance of students. Hence they send them to private tuitions wher...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 637, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...does not understand it, the first time. This gives greater confidence to such st...
^^
Line 7, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... negative aspects of private tuitions, I suggest that intellectually weak student...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2077.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 390.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32564102564 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74814981691 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502564102564 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 631.8 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1759121759 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.8125 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354893425955 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126959807068 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0805517503129 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195478136783 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0982385784214 0.056905535591 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.