Some parents buy their children a large number of toys to play with. What are the advantages and disadvantages for the child of having a large number of toys?
It is true that, many parents provide a great deal of playthings for their offspring. While this offers a few advantages, there are also some disadvantages which are worth considering.
There are several benefits to children playing with a lot of toys throughout their childhood. Firstly, playing with various things in a child's life has a big impact on the adulthood. Many psychologists believe that toys and playful hobbies are intended to improve children's creativity as well as their talents and skills can be recognized in this phase. For example, kids who their ears are so sensitive to musical toys might be a gifted musician and artist in the future. Secondly, as far as communication is concerned, children learn social skill as they spend time with different toys which would lead them to establish a good relationship with peers. Finally, not only do numerous toys entertain children in an effective way, but also prevent any obsessional manners about having toys.
On the other hand, the drawbacks of having a large number of toys cannot be neglected. In the first place, a wide range of toys is mainly made in plastic and other harmful substances which are detrimental to kids’ health. Consequently, when it comes to environmental pollution, we would spontaneously produce a great deal of non-renewable toys converting them to rubbish after a while. What’s more, children’s expectations might have been increased by providing any playthings for them, maybe continuing in adolescence that parents have to accommodate children's needs all of the time. Eventually, in terms of social gap, all of the children couldn’t afford their favorites while they will see in peers’ hands. Thus, providing various toys might bring about bad feelings like jealousy in other kids.
In conclusion, there are clear positives and negatives for providing a lot of toys for children by parents.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...f playthings for their offspring. While this offers a few advantages, there are also...
^^^^
Line 3, column 710, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an effective way" with adverb for "effective"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...nly do numerous toys entertain children in an effective way, but also prevent any obsessional manne...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 44, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...the other hand, the drawbacks of having a large number of toys cannot be neglected. In the first ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 584, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...nts have to accommodate childrens needs all of the time. Eventually, in terms of social ga...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 637, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...me. Eventually, in terms of social gap, all of the children couldn't afford their fav...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as, it is true, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27124183007 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01982888306 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607843137255 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1381115887 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.533333333 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6 7.06120827912 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394966317146 0.244688304435 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119962003868 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679304021978 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202344846736 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0622834650222 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.