News stories on TV and in newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures. Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words. What is your opinion about this?
Nowadays, our media such as TV or newspapers widely broadcast news and stories by representing pictures to impress general public intensively. I completely agree with the idea that pictures rather than terminology can be extremely productive.
There are several reasons why images are considered to be more welcomed than words. When it comes to visual aspect, images seem to be more sustainable in our minds. In fact, by visualizing something during reading or listening, we can assist our minds to comprehend conveniently and the appearance of pictures or films accelerate this matter prominently. What’s more, in the fast-paced modern city life, less number of people be able to dedicate time for reading a newsprint in detailed. Consequently, we have encountered lots of people flicking through the newspapers which mostly has been covered by pictures to transmit happens appropriately.
I believe that written words should go immensely through with adequate representation. Firstly, regarding our childhood milestones, children are being bombarded with many comic books having accustomed to the visual pattern. Furthermore, even if the contents are attentive and high-quality readers are more likely to perceive a news story escorted by a vision. Whenever I see my favorite subject on screen or in a newsprint, unconsciously my curiosity makes me read or watch that story to the full. Finally, pictures make it easy to filter out stories we are not interested in that written word have not had this qualification yet.
In conclusion, it is clear to me that media stories should be followed by images to influence audiences greater.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 116, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ies by representing pictures to impress general public intensively. I completely agree with th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, regarding, so, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39534883721 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1095032201 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651162790698 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5362332068 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.076923077 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8461538462 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192260489024 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636698069526 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438251275341 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107378546802 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515018257784 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.