Some parents buy their children a large number of toys to play with.
What are the advantages and disadvantages for the child of having a large number of toys?
Some parents want their children have a big amount of toys that why they spent money for this. At the same time, diversity of toys can develops and teaches children there also drawbacks to be taken into account.
Firstly, one benefit of having many toys is that this develops child’s creative skills. For example, the Lego constructor can be used like an instrument to develop imagination and fantasy because it has variety of models and colours. Secondly, having a lot of toys is advantageous because children take their first steps in learning how to communicate with other children. Many of them enjoy play with each other especially when there are a large number of toys, so children can share a lot.
On the other hand, one problem when children have amount of toys is that it potentially exposes them to be spoiled. For example, in some families parents are forced to buy new toys every time they are asked for it from their children. As a result, children are might be bad-behaved when parents refuse. Another possible issue is that the big amount of toys could lead to a mess in a child’s room. It is essential having special containers or places to store all toys in order; moreover parents should also clean them periodically. Other negative aspect is that children possibly could not understand the value of toys because of its numbers. For instance, some toys can be damage or broken or even through away. So children will not worry about it because parents can buy new one.
In conclusion, while children can benefit from playing with a large number of toys, it can also lead to be pampered or bad-behaved.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 444, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...th each other especially when there are a large number of toys, so children can share a lot. On...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 51, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'amounted'.
Suggestion: amounted
...er hand, one problem when children have amount of toys is that it potentially exposes ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 704, Rule ID: THROUGH_AWAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throw'?
Suggestion: throw
...me toys can be damage or broken or even through away. So children will not worry about ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 61, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... children can benefit from playing with a large number of toys, it can also lead to be pampered o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1353.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79787234043 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55438555609 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524822695035 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.6167061611 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.2 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.86666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.430279265166 0.244688304435 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143926302691 0.084324248473 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713411823969 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258159143623 0.151304729494 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469830610613 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.