Some parents think children should have mobile phones, others disagree. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
In this tech-savvy era, without any qualms, it is affirmed that having mobile phones cause serious repercussions over children health and behaviour. Whilst other coincide that juveniles should have a personal cellular phone. Thereby, I agree with the former viewpoint and in this essay, I shall explain both the sides of the arguments by analysing it.
On the one hand, there are compelling pieces of evidence are obtainable to prove that providing mobile-phone to children would cause harmful effects. Firstly, the paramount concrete reason is young people get addicted to mobile games, and this disrupts their studies. Secondly, to go hand in hand, this would make them to less take part in physical activity. Thirdly, the hindmost inextricable feature is children brains are highly vulnerable to cellphone radiations. For instance, the World Health Organisation classifies that cellular phone as a risk for children, since it emits excess radiation.
On the flip side, there are people across the board discriminate that giving mobile phones to children have a myriad of reasons. First of all, through cellphones, it is more facile to find their children whereabouts. Furthermore, withal they explain that working parent's pick their children from after-class or the tuition, by a single text message or a phone call, which cut their wait-time. However, there are concerns about the serious impacts of children by both physically and psychologically. For example, according to the recent Nielsen survey report, children under age 14 have an improper sleeping pattern, due to over usage of mobiles.
In conclusion, providing a cellular to children would engender serious issues. Ergo, it's contrary might be curbed or overlooked. Consequently, despite social needs, providing mobile phones to children is not essential.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50709219858 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84317784858 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63829787234 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4229254348 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0625 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.625 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213040441873 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068284464584 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516051295948 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127101292089 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524555367525 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.