Some people are fond of buying new gadgets, phones, or laptops. Is this a good or bad thing? Discuss your opinion.
With the advancement in technology, electronic gadgets, such as laptops, smartphones and smartwatches are flooding the digital market and attract numerous gadget lovers. I think that it is a welcoming trend because of the bright side it offers in terms of internal happiness and competitiveness. I will further explain my viewpoint with suitable examples.
Firstly, the use of cutting-edge technology keeps an individual up to date and advanced. Tech-freaks learn the latest features and technical configurations by purchasing the latest launched models of electronic devices, which makes them competitive in society. As there are many such jobs where such technical skills and ability to compare the old and new version of electronic equipment are required, this group of people get an added benefit in the job market because of their this personal interest. In addition to this, they can guide their friends and families to choose the best model of any smart device. Therefore, the aforementioned factors contribute to the positive side of this phenomenon.
Secondly, some people purchase the latest versions of electronic gadgets for maintaining their status symbol in society. Owning newly launched gizmos is considered to add a charm to an individual's personality and eventually, one gets joy and feel content with such social achievement. For instance, the recent study conducted on university students clearly shows that owning a newly released iPhone x offers them that ultimate happiness which they always dreamt of experiencing. Therefore, the purchase of these digital devices has positive implications.
In conclusion, I describe this phenomenon of buying the latest technical gadgets as a positive development as it enhances one's technical knowledge and provides internal satisfaction.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 186, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...zmos is considered to add a charm to an individuals personality and eventually, one gets jo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65567765568 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10886524918 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6941391617 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.769230769 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53846153846 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0980981000876 0.244688304435 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0300387202592 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0350341667232 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0560271577977 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191549028612 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.