Some people argue that arts, such as paintings and music, are a waste of money and the government should spend this money on other public services.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Although art represent the culture of the country, few people opine that governing body should not spend money on preserving it rather should invest in other sectors to help the overall population of the country. In my opinion, conserving the tradition of the country is crucial and the nation should have budget to keep its art field.
The foremost reason I believe to save art is to keep the treasure for the future generation. Enormous knowledge is gained through old manuscripts, folk dance, music, carvings and paintings done by ancient civilization. It is the way by which youth understand the lifestyle and artifacts of old era. Undoubtedly, the art field requires budget to amend its wear and tear due to passing time. For example, Antique items should be kept in museum and forts ruined by decay of time should be refurbished;these all need monetary funds to keep them alive, which however cannot be accomplished without government steps of allocating budget and maintaining them. Secondly, the art of country also contribute towards economy by attracting tourists from other countries. For instance, the ' Taj Mahal ' in India is an excellent example of Mughal art and architecture, and government of India is taking every step to maintain it, which is in turn contributing to government funds by attracting the tourist and history lovers across the globe.
In contrast, the critics argue that public services should be given high priority and money for repairing the art monuments is totally waste but the country is known by its art and ancient artifacts, which can never be ignored. They believe that good transportation, roads and other services builds the nation, giving convenience to the citizens. Although this is true to some extent; however, the facilities cannot be availed at such a high cost of destroying country's art. The country's royalty is seen in its art and it should be treasured by every civilization.
To sum up, I pen down saying that public services are essential for country to prosper; but it should not be done at the cost of burning old art of the country. In any case, the art sector should get money for its maintenance because it showcase the rich culture and tradition of the land.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 777, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... from other countries. For instance, the Taj Mahal in India is an excellent exam...
^^
Line 5, column 788, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... countries. For instance, the Taj Mahal in India is an excellent example of Mugh...
^^
Line 13, column 238, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'showcases'?
Suggestion: showcases
...et money for its maintenance because it showcase the rich culture and tradition of the l...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in contrast, in any case, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1863.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00806451613 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77585362309 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543010752688 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.8584046207 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.2 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151350045088 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499002177879 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467090213999 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102799951375 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366281907586 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.