Some people argue that arts, such as paintings and music, are a waste of money and the government should spend this money on other public services.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is a debatable issue, that motivate the skills like painting and music is not worthy. Instead of spending cost on these activities, authorities should incur more on other facilities like medical, infrastructure. I completely oppose this mentality, because these acts always connected us with our culture. Moreover, nowadays in these sectors individual can settle their career very well.
To stay in touch with our tradition and customs these creativities is very essential. In country like India people use music for various purposes from birth to till death. In south India people use painting techniques to decorate their homes, offices and temples at different occasion such as Diwali, Onam, Pongal and many more. They believe that these things are useful to worship their lord. Some people use these activities to describe their emotions. For example, in a hindi movie name “Tare Zammen Pe” a little Ishan disclose their feeling by the way of extraordinary paintings which has been found by his teacher that he wants to say something what can not disclose through words because of understanding issues. Therefore, these things play very vital role in everyone’s life.
Establishing career by the help of these skills are become famous among youngsters. People with melodious voice sang songs at different platforms like Indian Idol, Saregamapa and other reality shows and achieved a designated place like Harshdeep Kaur, Abhijeet Sawant and many more. People with these hobbies now do not need to worry about their incomes because these are god gifted skills which help to raise their finance in future. A very well famous show on colours name India’s Got Talent give an earning platform to a sand artist who was very poor and now he runs a school of this art at free of cost. Hence, these skills are not useless.
Conclusively, assumption of numerous people that development of art forms are wastage of financial resources has been proved wrongly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 425, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...kills which help to raise their finance in future. A very well famous show on colours nam...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, such as, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1675.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25078369906 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66528111658 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633228840125 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.5706919163 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5294117647 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7647058824 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35294117647 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118914432615 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0381933505445 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0294288773856 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0711808624951 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305064902645 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.