Some people argue that arts, such as paintings and music, are a waste of money and the government should spend this money on other public services.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It a debatable statement that motivating talents in paintings and music is a mere waste of money rather authorities should incur more money on the development of medical and infrastructure sectors. I completely oppose this idea as these are closely related with our culture and it enhances an individual in their career paths.
To begin with, Artistic departments are directly linked with our culture and tradition. In our country music is highly connected with us right from birth till death. In some parts of India people are organized well with the paintings and we could more repeatedly find a plethora of sculptures embossed with variety of colors in homes, temples and so on. In addition, one can expose his or her thoughts with regards to emotions. An apt illustration was shown in a Hindi movie “tare zameen paar” where a little boy was able to express his feelings via a picture because of his understanding issues.
Secondly, establishing career with the support of these skills now has become eminent among youngsters. Nowadays there are multiple reality talent shows which renders a helping hand for the unrevealed talents and they are also offered a financial support through these programs. For instance, A famous Television program named “Top Talents” provide a chance to a sand artist and now he runs his own free classes to enrich his talents as well many talents are getting benefited out of this.
To recapitulate , Government should encourage such talents in order to save our culture and support little talents to reach the pinnacle.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 355, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... of colors in homes, temples and so on. In addition, one can expose his or her tho...
^^
Line 13, column 16, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...efited out of this. To recapitulate , Government should encourage such talent...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1335.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19455252918 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80763593475 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665369649805 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7328399742 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.363636364 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3636363636 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160767811821 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602473926222 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579133485422 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103464321097 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712534192488 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.