Some people argue that technologies inventions, such as mobile phones, are making people socially less interactive.
Do you agree or disagree?
Technology inventions have immensely contributed to bridging the communication gap globally. However, many people argue that on one hand communication devices have made long-distance interactions easier, on the other hand, mobile phones are making people less interactive. I staunchly agree with this statement as cellular phones have become a one box entertainment package thus reducing the social interactions amongst people. In the below paragraphs I will elucidate on this topic with relevant examples.
Firstly technological evolution has led to the invention of ultra-compact cell phones embedded with social media applications like You-Tube, Facebook, What's App and Viber which provide a wide array of social media content to keep people occupied most of the times thus making them less interactive. For instance, as per the recent survey was done in India, it was published that 90 per cent of people commuting by train is busy using mobile phone watching YouTube. Additionally, most of the mobile phones have gaming applications which people use as pass time thus reducing interactions levels. Although such trends are rising in underdeveloped countries however they are more visible in developing countries.
Lastly, people nowadays have become busier in their lives hence they use mobile phones to keep them up to date with the events happening globally thus minimizing the interaction levels. Technology applications like Google provide all the information from news, sports, and politics. For example, in Canada, it was published that most of the students are heavy users of mobile phones making them less interactive compared to the past.
To conclude though cellular phones have made communication easier, however, on the other hand, it can be seen that people have become less social in comparison to the past.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 508, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e on this topic with relevant examples. Firstly technological evolution has led ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 152, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...a applications like You-Tube, Facebook, Whats App and Viber which provide a wide arra...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 711, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e more visible in developing countries. Lastly, people nowadays have become busi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 435, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... less interactive compared to the past. To conclude though cellular phones have ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, lastly, so, thus, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51063829787 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93197871242 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567375886525 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1871871515 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.5 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257114204956 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.089398218227 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697866161709 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159200023627 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449378620942 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.