Some people believe that advertisement have a useful function for TV viewers while others disagree.
What is your opinion.
Nowadays, some people believed that there is a useful function for the advertisement in TV channel. But some people think the TV advertisement has less value to different viewers. The following essay will discuss in both way.
Watching TV is the most important entertainment activities at home. According by the reliable statistics, most of the families owned at least one TV set to receive the free program channels. Such as BBC, CNN, ABC, they have provided the programs from NEWS to Drama board-casting. In addition, all the programs came from free with the commercial advertisements which might be helpful to the audiences. Such as the shopping promotion, property informations and so on.
However, more and more paid channels to provide high quality productions without any commercial advertisements. The free TV advertisement has lost the target customers more and more. For instance, you can get a advertisement free from Netflix once you agreed to pay $19/month. Moreover, the younger generation has less impact through the TV advertisement due to deeply using internet and mobile phone. Internet advertisement has a better design to attract the customer’s eye balls, and provide a great experience to interact with people. People will get a precisely recommendation for any imformations based on their favours.
In conclusion, despite the TV advertisement still has useful function to those who rely on free channels. But the young people will prefer to access the information by mobile phones and computers. TV advertisement is losing the value from the youth group.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 210, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ore and more. For instance, you can get a advertisement free from Netflix once yo...
^
Line 5, column 558, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('precisely') instead an adjective, or a noun ('recommendation') instead of another adjective.
...o interact with people. People will get a precisely recommendation for any imformations based on their fav...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, still, at least, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1341.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.364 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19454785533 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.5101580961 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.8823529412 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7058823529 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76470588235 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265087444911 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0903090636348 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110902073746 0.0667982634062 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187070074609 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111235464603 0.056905535591 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.