Some people believe that certain old buildings are worth preserving more than other buildings. What type of old buildings are worth preserving? Do the advantages of preserving these buildings outweigh the disadvantages?
It is clear that old buildings which there have been passed out from our ancestor, should be preserved. However, the importance of maintenance of other buildings is significant. Preserving old buildings have numerous effects on people’s life which is discussed in the essay.
There are wide range of old buildings which are worth preserving. Firstly, world heritage sites should be protected because there are a part of our culture heritage. Consequently, people find it useful. Secondly, buildings and other objects of historical and cultural importance should be preserved. For instance, some remained buildings which there refer to prehistoric times. Thirdly, historical buildings that there are architecturally significant are worth preserving since these buildings provide an insight into the history of every country. For example, old churches and castles
From historical point of view the advantages of preserving old buildings outweigh the disadvantages. The main advantage is that these buildings reflect the lifestyle of the people who lived in a particular era. In addition, people can learn about how our ancestor lived in these buildings. Another positive point is that old and historical buildings are full of valuable life lessons that individuals can benefit from lessons. Moreover, we can learn about the mindset of our origins. Furthermore, preserving old buildings is a cultural and historical experience that provide a unique learning experience.
In conclusion, although preserving old buildings play a vital role in people’s historical life, other buildings by passing time become valuable. Also, preserving buildings is important for finding a sense of identity.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70355731225 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03456422628 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529644268775 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2498453006 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8823529412 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8823529412 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.58823529412 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.507841715198 0.244688304435 208% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180805775701 0.084324248473 214% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111489351772 0.0667982634062 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.350328272261 0.151304729494 232% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320765405245 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.34 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.19 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.