Some people believe that governments should only fund scientific researches (e.g. cure for diseases or food production) others disagree. Discuss both sides and give your opinion?
It is clear that governments should provide scientists with free scientific researches facilities. However, most people believe that governments should play similar role in other topics regardless of science. From my point of view scientific, historical, technological, environmental and other relating topics should be supported in order to advancement in each field.
On the one hand, scientific research findings are valuable because of several reasons. Firstly, the number of incurable diseases are increasing these days. Therefore, governments by setting up funds to cure diseases can help people who suffer from health problems. Secondly, as a result of the importance of food production, scientists are more likely to study about it. Thus, governments by establishing funds to discover new methods of food production, can guarantee the quality of food. In addition, people are less likely to deal with diseases like food poisoning. Thirdly, since the price of medical facilities are high, most researchers cannot afford. Consequently, governments can collect money for medical purpose. Moreover, they help scientists to achieve their goals.
On another hand, from an environmental perspective, people should be raised environmental awareness in order to preserve the environment. Therefore, governments should lunch an environmental fund. From technological point of view, as a result of widespread use of the Internet, most findings are related to technology. Thus, governments should fund technological researches.
In conclusion, every field which it can make our life full of happiness is valuable and governments or other organization should attention them because the main purpose of these researches is that facilitate our life style.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, thus, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7984496124 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19644091783 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589147286822 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.9506218223 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1764705882 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64705882353 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277480725203 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0877896146717 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056483786935 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153642578011 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535520591299 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.77 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.