Some people say that now we see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both views and write your opinion.
Nowadays advancement in technology facilitate everything and it has been changed our lifestyle. Most people benefit from new facilities and they are more likely to use digital goods like phones or tablets to watch films. However, most people believe that it is more enjoyable to see films in cinema.
On the one hand, most people are willing to watch films on phones. Firstly, people who have a tight schedule do not have sufficient time in order to go to a cinema. Consequently, they would rather to watch films on their smart phones. Secondly, as a result of widespread use of the Internet, people can have access to wide range of films regardless of time and place. Thirdly, most people who have children find it difficult to go cinema on a regular basis. Therefore, they take full advantage of phones and tablets.
On the other hand, some people believe that films should be seen in a cinema. Firstly, the quality of watching films in cinema is higher than phones. In addition, they can spend some quality of time with their friends or family members. Secondly, the cost of selling cinema tickets can be used for maintenance of old cinema. From public point of view, it could be valuable.
In conclusion, from my perspective we can enjoy both side. When we have more free time we can go to a cinema where is within walking distance of our home and if we do not have any time we just enjoy watching films on phones or tablets.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1181.0 1615.20841683 73% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64960629921 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47821746082 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51968503937 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 379.8 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.4905119639 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.8125 106.682146367 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.875 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.375 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316992960063 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111534987087 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825868985399 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196898250174 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541002965523 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 13.0946893788 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.39 12.4159519038 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 78.4519038076 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.