Some people believe that companies should hire young people. Others say that older experienced staff should be hired.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
The argument, over whether corporations should recruit younger staff or older staff, has not been settled yet. It is often argued by some that the employers should select a young workforce because they are hard-working as compared to others. Meanwhile, others still claim that the experienced staff should be prioritized considering their well-shaped skills. This essay will argue both sides of the argument before drawing a logical opinion.
On the one hand, the supporters of hiring fresh graduates believe that the companies can get benefit from their hard work. As they stepped into professional life with a lot of enthusiasm and motivation, they struggle hard to bring betterment to the company to secure a permanent place. Take an example of IBN, Australia, it experimented with employing a young workforce, which resulted in up-gradation of the company’s ranking due to young force hard work. Thus, appointing naïve is to some extent beneficial for the companies.
While on the other hand, the advocates of the view that experienced staff should be hired considering their communication and decision-making skills. As older staff can help with their experience not only developing organizational credentials, but also interact with international delegates to expand the business. For instance, Nestle, Sweden heavily relied on its experience to make ties with the international market. Therefore, the older workforce is also considered as a valuable asset for any company.
However, from my perspective, companies can benefit a lot by selecting both sets of employees. This way they can utilize the positive energy which is present in a fresh youngster, and the vast experience of older employees, for the prosperity of the organization.
To sum up, people may vary in their opinions on which age group should be preferred during the recruitment process, but I believe a combination of both would work wonders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1645.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44701986755 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09420387617 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602649006623 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5041060359 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.666666667 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1333333333 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285698797972 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899640058451 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0723204338341 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149384660473 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731336355079 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.